Earlier this summer, CT started running an occasional feature on reader responses. Here’s a new installment.
The pro-life abolitionist approach risks repeating the trajectory of the 2010 Tea Party movement’s: initial energy and primary successes followed by electoral losses, internal GOP divisions, and diminished policy impact. Both movements prioritize ideological absolutism over pragmatic coalition building, often targeting fellow conservatives as insufficiently committed. Abolitionism could produce short-term fervor but long-term setbacks in advancing protections for the unborn. —Joseph Kinlin
It’s like Stanley Hauerwas said: “Jesus is very clear. Wealth is a problem.” Musk’s wealth won’t protect him from God’s judgment. It would be
...
This post was originally published on this site.
